Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73 | 90.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-07-20 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 9.56 ounces |
| Ice silver and Jungle green | Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| -- | Super AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G 5G chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11 | 7.7 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has an overall score of 90.6, which is much better than realme X50 5G's general score of 73. Both phones in our current comparison work with Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has newer 11 version and realme X50 5G has Android 10 version, giving you some additional features. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 is a newer and a lot thinner phone than realme X50 5G, but it's also noticeably heavier.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 features a little bit better hardware performance than realme X50 5G, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The realme X50 5G features a bit sharper display than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a bit smaller display and a quite lower 1080 x 2400 resolution, it also counts with a quite higher pixel count in each inch of display.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has much more storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than realme X50 5G, because it has more internal memory. The realme X50 5G captures way better pictures and videos than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a camera with a much higher resolution and a larger aperture to take better photography and video in poorly lited environments.
Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with a bit superior battery life than realme X50 5G, because it has a 5% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.