Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-07-20 | 2020-05-05 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Ice silver and Jungle green | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | IPS LCD |
| 399 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G 5G chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a general score of 81.1, which is better than realme X50 5G's global score of 73. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is a just a bit heavier device than the realme X50 5G, but they have the same thickness. Both phones we are comparing here use the same Android 10 OS, so both should give identical OS features.
Realme X50 5G has a bit sharper screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has a bit smaller screen, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, the realme X50 5G also counts with a little bit higher pixel amount per inch of screen. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a greater storage capacity for apps and games than realme X50 5G, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD extension slot that holds up to 512 GB.
The realme X50 5G counts with a little better processing power than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro. They have a 6 GB RAM memory and 8 cores. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features greater battery life than realme X50 5G, because it has 5020mAh of battery capacity. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro takes much clearer videos and photos than realme X50 5G, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is worse for capturing photographs in low-light environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also counts with a camera in the back with a much higher resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.