Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 93.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| Android 10 | iOS 15.x |
| 2020-03-05 | 2021-09-24 |
| 6.26 x 2.92 x 0.35 inches | 5.78 x 2.81 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 7.20 ounces |
| Moss green and Rust red | Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2532 x 1170 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.63 | 10.71 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 3095mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 5.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 13 Pro is way better than realme X50 Pro 5G, having a overall score of 93.3 against 74.9. The iPhone 13 Pro is a newer phone, and it's also a bit lighter and thinner than the realme X50 Pro 5G. IPhone 13 Pro counts with iOS 15.x operating system, and realme X50 Pro 5G has Android 10 operating system.
IPhone 13 Pro counts with a little more vivid display than realme X50 Pro 5G, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a slightly higher 1170 x 2532px resolution, a quite better quantity of pixels in each inch in the display and a little brighter display. The iPhone 13 Pro features a superior processor than realme X50 Pro 5G, because although it has less cpu cores , and they both have 6 GB of RAM, the iPhone 13 Pro also counts with a 64-bit CPU.
IPhone 13 Pro has as much memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos as the realme X50 Pro 5G one, both have exactly the same internal storage. The realme X50 Pro 5G captures much clearer videos and photos than Apple iPhone 13 Pro, because although it has a smaller aperture and lower 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the realme X50 Pro 5G also counts with a back facing camera with lot more megapixels.
Realme X50 Pro 5G features a much longer battery life than iPhone 13 Pro, because it has a 4200mAh battery size instead of 3095mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.