Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-05 | 2018-10-26 |
| 6.26 x 2.92 x 0.35 inches | 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Moss green and Rust red | Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1792 x 828 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 411 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.63 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone XR is a little bit better than realme X50 Pro 5G, with an 82 score against 74.9. Apple iPhone XR's design is a bit thinner and a little bit lighter than realme X50 Pro 5G, despite of the fact that it was released only 17 months before. Realme X50 Pro 5G has a bit more vivid display than Apple iPhone XR, because it has a quite larger screen, much more brightness, a better display density and a better resolution of 1080 x 2400px.
Apple iPhone XR counts with a little bit better performance than realme X50 Pro 5G, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory and 2 lesser and slower cpu cores, it also counts with a 64-bits processor. The realme X50 Pro 5G takes much better photographs and videos than Apple iPhone XR, because although it has slower video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and a same size aperture, the realme X50 Pro 5G also counts with a lot better 64 megapixels resolution back-facing camera and a much bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting much higher quality photos.
The realme X50 Pro 5G has a very superior memory for apps and games than iPhone XR, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity. The realme X50 Pro 5G features a superior battery performance than Apple iPhone XR, because it has a 43% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.