Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-05 | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.26 x 2.92 x 0.35 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| Moss green and Rust red | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.63 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone XS is much better than the realme X50 Pro 5G, with an 84.2 score against 74.9. Even though iPhone XS is older than realme X50 Pro 5G, it's construction is somewhat thinner and lighter. The Apple iPhone XS has a bit better CPU than realme X50 Pro 5G, because although it has 2 GB lesser RAM memory and an inferior number of cores and they are also slower, it also counts with a 64-bit processing unit.
Realme X50 Pro 5G counts with a bit more vivid screen than iPhone XS, because although it has a just a bit worse number of pixels per display inch and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2400px, it also counts with a lot brighter display and a quite larger display. Realme X50 Pro 5G takes much better pictures and videos than iPhone XS, because although it has slower video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a same size diafragm aperture, the realme X50 Pro 5G also counts with a lot larger back-facing camera sensor shooting much higher quality videos and pictures and a lot higher 64 megapixels resolution back facing camera.
Realme X50 Pro 5G has a much greater memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Apple iPhone XS, because it has 128 GB internal storage. Realme X50 Pro 5G features a much better battery performance than iPhone XS, because it has a 4200mAh battery capacity instead of 2659mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.