Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 10 | Android 5.1, 5.0 |
| 2020-03-05 | 2014-10-15 |
| 6.26 x 2.92 x 0.35 inches | 6.27 x 3.27 x 0.40 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Moss green and Rust red | Blue and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1019.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 490 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 9 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 3220mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 330 hours standby time 24 hours talk time |
| 6.08 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Nexus 6 has an overall score of 81.1, which is just a bit better than the realme X50 Pro 5G's 74.9 global score. Even though the Google Nexus 6 is older and thicker than realme X50 Pro 5G, it's body is still somewhat lighter. Both of these phones have Android OS, but the Google Nexus 6 has an older 5.1 version and realme X50 Pro 5G has Android 10.
Realme X50 Pro 5G features a bit superior processor than Google Nexus 6, because although it has doesn't have a graphics processor, it also counts with 3 GB more RAM and a greater number of faster cores. Realme X50 Pro 5G and Google Nexus 6 both feature really similar screens, because although the Google Nexus 6 has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little more pixels per inch of screen and a better resolution of 2560 x 1440.
The realme X50 Pro 5G counts with a much better camera than Google Nexus 6, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same video frame rates, the realme X50 Pro 5G also has a lot better 64 megapixels resolution camera and a larger aperture for better photography and video in low light situations.
Realme X50 Pro 5G counts with a superior storage for games and applications than Google Nexus 6, because it has more internal storage capacity. The realme X50 Pro 5G has better battery lifetime than Google Nexus 6, because it has a 4200mAh battery size instead of 3220mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.