Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-05 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.26 x 2.92 x 0.35 inches | 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Moss green and Rust red | Black, Gray and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel is a little bit better than realme X50 Pro 5G, having a score of 80.2 against 74.9. Even though the Google Pixel is older than the realme X50 Pro 5G, it's design is incredibly lighter and a little thinner. The realme X50 Pro 5G has a little sharper screen than Google Pixel, because although it has a bit less pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a bigger screen.
Realme X50 Pro 5G and Google Pixel both feature incredibly similar storage for applications, games, photos and videos, both of them have the same internal storage. The realme X50 Pro 5G has a bit better CPU than Google Pixel, because it has a larger number of cores and more RAM. The realme X50 Pro 5G captures much clearer pictures and videos than Google Pixel, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the realme X50 Pro 5G also has a larger aperture to take better low-light photos and videos, a lot larger back-facing camera sensor and a back camera with lot more mega-pixels.
The realme X50 Pro 5G has a very superior battery life than Google Pixel, because it has 4200mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.