Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-05 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.26 x 2.92 x 0.35 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Moss green and Rust red | Black, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 194.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 522 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3 XL has a general score of 80.7, which is a little bit better than realme X50 Pro 5G's 74.9 overall score. The Google Pixel 3 XL design is lighter and thinner than realme X50 Pro 5G, even though it was released around a year before. The realme X50 Pro 5G counts with a bit better hardware performance than Google Pixel 3 XL, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the realme X50 Pro 5G also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The realme X50 Pro 5G counts with a little bit better looking display than Google Pixel 3 XL, because although it has a little bit less pixels per display inch and a way lower 1080 x 2400px resolution, it also counts with a little bit larger display. The realme X50 Pro 5G has a superior memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has more internal memory capacity.
Realme X50 Pro 5G counts with better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has a 4200mAh battery capacity against 3430mAh. The realme X50 Pro 5G features a very superior camera than Google Pixel 3 XL, and although they both have the same aperture, the same (4K) video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the realme X50 Pro 5G also has a much larger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a way more mega-pixels back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.