Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-03-05 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.26 x 2.92 x 0.35 inches | 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.19 ounces |
| Moss green and Rust red | Black, Purple and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 186.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3a has an overall score of 78.8, which is just a bit better than realme X50 Pro 5G's score of 74.9. Even though the Google Pixel 3a is older than realme X50 Pro 5G, it's body is just a little thinner and way lighter. These devices come with Android OS (operating system), but Google Pixel 3a has the newer 11 version and realme X50 Pro 5G has Android 10 version, so it provides you a lot of extra features and performance tweaks.
The realme X50 Pro 5G has a bit better looking display than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has a bit lower display density, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a little bit bigger screen. The realme X50 Pro 5G has a bit superior CPU than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the realme X50 Pro 5G also has 2 GB more RAM.
Realme X50 Pro 5G captures greater pictures and videos than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same aperture, the realme X50 Pro 5G also has a much bigger back camera sensor providing a way higher image quality and a much better 64 mega-pixels resolution camera.
Realme X50 Pro 5G features a way bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity. The realme X50 Pro 5G counts with a very superior battery duration than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a 4200mAh battery size instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.