Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-03-05 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.26 x 2.92 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Moss green and Rust red | Black, Purple and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 167.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3a XL has a score of 78.9, which is just a bit better than realme X50 Pro 5G's 74.9 overall score. The Google Pixel 3a XL is an older phone than the realme X50 Pro 5G, but Google made it somewhat lighter and a bit thinner anyway. Both of these phones use Android OS (Operating System), but the Google Pixel 3a XL has the newer 11 version while realme X50 Pro 5G has Android 10.
Realme X50 Pro 5G features a little better processing power than Google Pixel 3a XL, and although they both have the same number of cores, the realme X50 Pro 5G also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The realme X50 Pro 5G has a more vivid screen than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has a slightly better 1080 x 2400 resolution, a little bit larger display and a little more pixels per screen inch.
The realme X50 Pro 5G features a very superior camera than Google Pixel 3a XL, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the same video definition and a F1.8 aperture, the realme X50 Pro 5G also has a way bigger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a much better 64 MP resolution back facing camera.
The realme X50 Pro 5G counts with a lot bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has more internal memory capacity. Realme X50 Pro 5G has a bit longer battery life than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has a 14 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.