Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-05 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.26 x 2.92 x 0.35 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Moss green and Rust red | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 is a bit better than realme X50 Pro 5G, having an 81.9 score against 74.9. Google Pixel 4's body is a little thinner and notably lighter than realme X50 Pro 5G, although both of them were only released with a few months difference. Google Pixel 4 and realme X50 Pro 5G count with incredibly similar processing units, both of them have a 6 GB RAM memory and 8 cpu cores.
The realme X50 Pro 5G counts with a bit sharper display than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a quite worse quantity of pixels per display inch, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a little bigger screen. The realme X50 Pro 5G counts with a very superior camera than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for low light photos and videos, and they both have the same video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the realme X50 Pro 5G also counts with a lot higher 64 megapixels resolution camera and a lot bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Realme X50 Pro 5G features a lot bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Google Pixel 4, because it has 64 GB more internal memory capacity. Realme X50 Pro 5G features a very superior battery performance than Google Pixel 4, because it has 4200mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.