Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-03-05 | 2020-08-20 |
| 6.26 x 2.92 x 0.35 inches | 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Moss green and Rust red | Just black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 349.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a has a score of 82.9, which is much better than realme X50 Pro 5G's 74.9 overall score. Both phones in this review come with Android OS (operating system), but Google Pixel 4a has a newer 11 version while realme X50 Pro 5G has Android 10, so it counts with a couple additional features. The Google Pixel 4a body is way lighter and a bit thinner than realme X50 Pro 5G, even when both of them were released with only 6 months difference.
Realme X50 Pro 5G has a bit faster CPU than Google Pixel 4a. Both of them have the same number of cores and a 6 GB RAM. The realme X50 Pro 5G features a little bit better display than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a little worse quantity of pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a little bit larger screen and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400px.
Realme X50 Pro 5G and Google Pixel 4a feature very similar memory for apps and games, both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage capacity. The realme X50 Pro 5G features a way better camera than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same (4K) video resolution, the realme X50 Pro 5G also counts with a way more MP back facing camera and a much bigger back camera sensor.
The realme X50 Pro 5G has improved battery life than Google Pixel 4a, because it has a 4200mAh battery capacity instead of 3140mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.