Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-03-05 | 2020-11-19 |
| 6.26 x 2.92 x 0.35 inches | 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Moss green and Rust red | Clearly white and Just black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 3885mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a 5G is much better than the realme X50 Pro 5G, getting an 87.5 score against 74.9. Even though the Google Pixel 4a 5G and realme X50 Pro 5G were only released 9 months apart, the Google Pixel 4a 5G is just a little thinner and somewhat lighter. Both phones in this comparison work with Android operating system, but Google Pixel 4a 5G has a more recent 11 version while realme X50 Pro 5G has Android 10 version, counting with some nice extra features and performance improvements.
The realme X50 Pro 5G has a slightly better looking screen than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has a just a bit less pixels per display inch, it also counts with a little bit larger screen and a little higher 1080 x 2400 resolution. Realme X50 Pro 5G counts with a little faster processing unit than Google Pixel 4a 5G. They have the same number of cores and 6 GB of RAM.
Google Pixel 4a 5G has as much storage capacity for games and applications as the realme X50 Pro 5G one, they have exactly the same internal storage. Realme X50 Pro 5G shoots much clearer photographs and videos than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has lower video frame rates and a tinier aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the realme X50 Pro 5G also counts with a back camera with lot more megapixels and a lot bigger camera sensor which provides a way higher image and video quality.
The realme X50 Pro 5G has a bit superior battery life than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has an 8% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.