Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-05 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.26 x 2.92 x 0.35 inches | 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.33 ounces |
| Moss green and Rust red | Just black and Sorta sage |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 548.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 4080mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 5 is much better than the realme X50 Pro 5G, getting a score of 89 against 74.9. The Google Pixel 5 is a extremely lighter and somewhat thinner device than the realme X50 Pro 5G, even when they were only released with a few months difference. The realme X50 Pro 5G counts with a bit better looking display than Google Pixel 5, because although it has a quite inferior pixels quantity per display inch, it also counts with a little bit larger screen and a slightly better 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution.
Realme X50 Pro 5G has just a little better processing power than Google Pixel 5, although it has less RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Realme X50 Pro 5G shoots better videos and photos than Google Pixel 5, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not nice for shooting pictures or video in low-light situations and worse 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same video definition, the realme X50 Pro 5G also counts with a way more mega pixels back-facing camera and a way larger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Google Pixel 5 and realme X50 Pro 5G feature incredibly similar storage capacity for apps and games, they have equal internal memory capacity. The realme X50 Pro 5G counts with just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Google Pixel 5, because it has a 3 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.