Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 92.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-03-05 | 2024-03-22 |
| 6.26 x 2.92 x 0.35 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 8.36 ounces |
| Moss green and Rust red | Agate Grey and Frozen Berry |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass and Titanium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1389.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2800 x 1280 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | LTPO |
| 411 pixels per inch | 453 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | 5000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 10.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | 1x Cortex-X4 3.3GHz, 3x Cortex-A720 3.2GHz, 2x Cortex- A720 3.0GHz, 2x Cortex-A520 2.3GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 24 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.63 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 1 TB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 23.2 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 5600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 7.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope |
Comparison review
Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design is a lot better than the realme X50 Pro 5G, getting a 92.1 score against 74.9. Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design's construction has the same thickness than realme X50 Pro 5G, but it's heavier. Both of these phones work with Android operating system, but the Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design has the newer 14 version and realme X50 Pro 5G has Android 10 version.
Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design has a much sharper display than realme X50 Pro 5G, because it has a quite greater pixels density, a way brighter display, a little bigger screen and a bit higher resolution of 1280 x 2800. Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design counts with much more storage capacity to install games and applications than realme X50 Pro 5G, because it has 1 TB internal storage.
Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design counts with a bit better hardware performance than realme X50 Pro 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design also has more RAM. The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design has greater battery performance than realme X50 Pro 5G, because it has 5600mAh of battery capacity.
Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design shoots a little bit better pictures and videos than realme X50 Pro 5G, because although it has a much worse 50 mega-pixels resolution camera in the back and a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, it also counts with a much larger aperture to capture better low-light photography and videos and a bigger camera sensor shooting better quality videos and photos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.