Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-05 | 2017-05-18 |
| 6.26 x 2.92 x 0.35 inches | 6.06 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Moss green and Rust red | Black, Blue, Silver and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 275.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | S-LCD 5 |
| 411 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The HTC U11 is a bit better than the realme X50 Pro 5G, getting a global score of 77.6 against 74.9. The HTC U11 is an way older device than realme X50 Pro 5G, but it's lighter and thinner anyway. Realme X50 Pro 5G counts with a little more vivid display than HTC U11, because although it has a little bit inferior pixels quantity per inch in the display and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2400, it also counts with a larger screen.
The realme X50 Pro 5G has a bit superior processor than HTC U11, and although they both have the same number of cores, the realme X50 Pro 5G also has 2 GB more RAM. The realme X50 Pro 5G captures greater photographs and videos than HTC U11, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not nice for capturing images or videos in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same video frame rates, the realme X50 Pro 5G also counts with a much better 64 megapixels resolution back facing camera and a lot bigger camera sensor.
Realme X50 Pro 5G features a slightly bigger storage capacity for games and applications than HTC U11, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity. The realme X50 Pro 5G has a very superior battery life than HTC U11, because it has 4200mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.