Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 10 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-03-05 | 2018-06-01 |
| 6.26 x 2.92 x 0.35 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Moss green and Rust red | Aurora black, Moroccan blue, Platinum gray and Raspberry rose |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 170.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 411 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG G7 ThinQ is just a bit better than realme X50 Pro 5G, having a global score of 81 against 74.9. The LG G7 ThinQ construction is incredibly lighter and somewhat thinner than the realme X50 Pro 5G, although it was released about a year before. These phones have Android operating system, but LG G7 ThinQ has a more recent 9.0 Pie version and realme X50 Pro 5G has Android 10 version, so it provides a couple additional features and performance optimizations.
The realme X50 Pro 5G has a bit more powerful CPU than LG G7 ThinQ, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the realme X50 Pro 5G also has a higher amount of RAM. The LG G7 ThinQ counts with a bit sharper display than realme X50 Pro 5G, because although it has a quite smaller display, and they both have the same display brightness, the LG G7 ThinQ also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 3120px and a higher quantity of pixels per display inch.
Realme X50 Pro 5G counts with a better camera than LG G7 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not good for low-light captures and slower 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same video quality, the realme X50 Pro 5G also counts with a way better resolution back facing camera and a way larger sensor taking way higher quality videos and photos.
The LG G7 ThinQ has a much bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than realme X50 Pro 5G, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. The realme X50 Pro 5G counts with a way better battery life than LG G7 ThinQ, because it has a 40% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.