Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 84.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-03-05 | 2019-04-11 |
| 6.26 x 2.92 x 0.35 inches | 5.98 x 2.83 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Moss green and Rust red | Aurora black, Carmine red and Platinum gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 215.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG G8 ThinQ is much better than realme X50 Pro 5G, with an 84.3 score against 74.9. Despite of the fact that the LG G8 ThinQ is older than the realme X50 Pro 5G, it's construction is lighter and just a little thinner. Both phones in this comparison review have Android OS (operating system), but LG G8 ThinQ has 9.0 Pie version while realme X50 Pro 5G has Android 10, so it offers some nice extra features and performance enhancements.
LG G8 ThinQ features just a bit better looking screen than realme X50 Pro 5G, because although it has way less brightness and a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a greater display pixels density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3120 pixels. The LG G8 ThinQ features a superior storage capacity for games and applications than realme X50 Pro 5G, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the LG G8 ThinQ also has an external SD slot that supports up to 1,95 TB.
LG G8 ThinQ's processor is very similar to realme X50 Pro 5G's processor, both of them have a 6 GB RAM and a Octa-Core processor. Realme X50 Pro 5G has improved battery performance than LG G8 ThinQ, because it has 4200mAh of battery capacity. Realme X50 Pro 5G captures better videos and photos than LG G8 ThinQ, because although it has slower video frame rate and a smaller camera aperture, and they both have the same video definition, the realme X50 Pro 5G also counts with a way bigger back-facing camera sensor which gives a much better image and video quality and a back camera with lot more megapixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.