Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 82.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-03-05 | 2019-11-01 |
| 6.26 x 2.92 x 0.35 inches | 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Moss green and Rust red | Aurora black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 222.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG G8X ThinQ is better than realme X50 Pro 5G, having a general score of 82.7 against 74.9. These phones use the same Android 10 OS (operating system), so they should give you the same operating system features. LG G8X ThinQ's construction is a bit thinner and a bit lighter than realme X50 Pro 5G, even when both were released with only 4 months difference.
Realme X50 Pro 5G counts with a slightly better looking display than LG G8X ThinQ, and although they both have a screen of the same size, the realme X50 Pro 5G also has a just a bit more pixels per inch of display and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px. The LG G8X ThinQ features much more storage for games and applications than realme X50 Pro 5G, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity, the LG G8X ThinQ also has a SD extension slot that admits up to 1,95 TB.
LG G8X ThinQ's CPU is just as good as the realme X50 Pro 5G one, they have 8 cores and 6 GB of RAM. Realme X50 Pro 5G has a better camera than LG G8X ThinQ, because although it has slower video frame rates, and they both have the same video definition and a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the realme X50 Pro 5G also counts with a lot better 64 megapixels resolution camera in the back and a way larger back-facing camera sensor taking much higher quality photos.
Realme X50 Pro 5G counts with just a little bit longer battery lifetime than LG G8X ThinQ, because it has a 5% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.