Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 85.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-03-05 | 2020-11-06 |
| 6.26 x 2.92 x 0.35 inches | 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 7.14 ounces |
| Moss green and Rust red | Titan gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 411 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 619L GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG K92 has a score of 85.4, which is much better than the realme X50 Pro 5G's 74.9 score. LG K92's body is just a little bit lighter and a little bit thinner than the realme X50 Pro 5G, even though both were released only a couple months apart. Both devices we compare here use the same Android 10 OS (Operating System), so both of them should provide you the same OS features.
Realme X50 Pro 5G has a little better hardware performance than LG K92. Both of them have 6 GB of RAM memory and 8 CPU cores. Realme X50 Pro 5G counts with a more vivid screen than LG K92, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2400px, the realme X50 Pro 5G also counts with a bit better pixel density.
LG K92 counts with a lot bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than realme X50 Pro 5G, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage, the LG K92 also has a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 1,95 TB. The realme X50 Pro 5G features a bit better camera than LG K92, and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the same (4K) video definition, a same resolution back camera and the same video frame rate, the realme X50 Pro 5G also has a bigger sensor which provides a better image and video quality.
Realme X50 Pro 5G has just a bit better battery life than LG K92, because it has 4200mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.