Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 10 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-03-05 | 2018-03-09 |
| 6.26 x 2.92 x 0.35 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Moss green and Rust red | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG V30S ThinQ is better than the realme X50 Pro 5G, having a global score of 82.5 against 74.9. These phones use Android OS, but the LG V30S ThinQ has a newer 8.0 Oreo version and realme X50 Pro 5G has Android 10. LG V30S ThinQ's body is thinner and much lighter than realme X50 Pro 5G, although it was released many years before.
The realme X50 Pro 5G has just a bit better hardware performance than LG V30S ThinQ. They have a Octa-Core CPU and the same RAM amount. Realme X50 Pro 5G counts with a bit sharper display than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a just a little less pixels per inch of screen and a way worse 1080 x 2400 resolution, it also counts with a little bigger screen.
The LG V30S ThinQ counts with a much greater storage for games and applications than realme X50 Pro 5G, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory capacity, the LG V30S ThinQ also has a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 1,95 TB. Realme X50 Pro 5G shoots way better photos and videos than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the realme X50 Pro 5G also counts with a much higher resolution back camera and a way larger back-facing camera sensor shooting lot better quality videos and photographs.
The realme X50 Pro 5G counts with superior battery life than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has 4200mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.