Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-05 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.26 x 2.92 x 0.35 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Moss green and Rust red | Black and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ has a general score of 81.3, which is a little bit better than the realme X50 Pro 5G's global score of 74.9. LG V35 ThinQ is an older phone than realme X50 Pro 5G, but LG made it thinner and way lighter. Realme X50 Pro 5G has a bit better looking screen than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a little bit worse screen density and a way lower resolution of 1080 x 2400, it also counts with a little larger screen.
The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a much better memory capacity for games and applications than realme X50 Pro 5G, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a SD extension slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. The LG V35 ThinQ features a processor that is very similar to realme X50 Pro 5G's processing unit, both of them have 8 cpu cores and the same RAM amount.
Realme X50 Pro 5G features a way better camera than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the realme X50 Pro 5G also counts with a way larger sensor and a way more megapixels back facing camera.
Realme X50 Pro 5G features longer battery duration than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 27 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.