Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-05 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.26 x 2.92 x 0.35 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Moss green and Rust red | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Velvet has a general score of 87.1, which is much better than realme X50 Pro 5G's general score of 74.9. Even when the LG Velvet and the realme X50 Pro 5G were only released 2 months apart, the LG Velvet is lighter and somewhat thinner. The realme X50 Pro 5G has a brighter display than LG Velvet, because although it has a little bit smaller screen and a bit worse 1080 x 2400 resolution, it also counts with a bit better pixels number per display inch.
The realme X50 Pro 5G features a bit faster processing unit than LG Velvet. Both have a Octa-Core CPU and a 6 GB RAM. The realme X50 Pro 5G shoots a bit better photos and videos than LG Velvet, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, a F1.8 diafragm aperture and the same video frame rates, the realme X50 Pro 5G also has a bigger sensor which offers a better photo and video quality and a back camera with a way higher 64 MP resolution.
LG Velvet has a much better storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than realme X50 Pro 5G, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage, the LG Velvet also has a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG Velvet counts with just a bit better battery duration than realme X50 Pro 5G, because it has a 2 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.