Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 83.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10 | Android 13 |
| 2020-03-05 | 2023-04-04 |
| 6.26 x 2.92 x 0.35 inches | 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Moss green and Rust red | Interstellar Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 740 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 40 Pro is better than realme X50 Pro 5G, getting a general score of 83.4 against 74.9. Motorola Edge 40 Pro's design is incredibly newer, a bit thinner and a little bit lighter than the realme X50 Pro 5G. Both phones we are comparing work with Android OS, but the Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a newer 13 version and realme X50 Pro 5G has Android 10, providing the user a couple additional features and performance enhancements.
Realme X50 Pro 5G has a bit more vivid display than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, because although it has a bit smaller screen and less brightness, and they both have the same exact 1080 x 2400 resolution, the realme X50 Pro 5G also counts with a bit higher quantity of pixels per screen inch. The realme X50 Pro 5G counts with a way better processing power than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with much more memory capacity for games and applications than realme X50 Pro 5G, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity. Motorola Edge 40 Pro takes just a bit better photos and videos than realme X50 Pro 5G, because although it has a way less MP resolution back camera, and they both have a same size aperture, the Motorola Edge 40 Pro also counts with a bigger back-facing camera sensor which offers a higher image and video quality and a way better video definition.
Motorola Edge 40 Pro features a little longer battery life than realme X50 Pro 5G, because it has a 10 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.