Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-03-05 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.26 x 2.92 x 0.35 inches | 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Moss green and Rust red | Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | 2000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a score of 86.3, which is much better than the realme X50 Pro 5G's 74.9 global score. Motorola Edge 50 Pro is a extremely newer phone, and it is also a little thinner and just a little lighter than realme X50 Pro 5G. Both phones we are comparing work with Android OS (operating system), but the Motorola Edge 50 Pro has newer 14 version while realme X50 Pro 5G has Android 10 version, providing lots of additional features and performance tweaks.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro has just a bit better display than realme X50 Pro 5G, because although it has a just a little less pixels per inch of display, and they both have exactly the same 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution, the Motorola Edge 50 Pro also counts with a little bit larger display and a much brighter screen.
The realme X50 Pro 5G counts with a very superior performance than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores. Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a way bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than realme X50 Pro 5G, because it has more internal memory capacity.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro has just a bit better battery lifetime than realme X50 Pro 5G, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 4200mAh. Realme X50 Pro 5G has a little bit better camera than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, because although it has a lot smaller camera aperture which is worse for shooting pictures in low-light situations and a tinier camera sensor which gives a worse image and video quality, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the realme X50 Pro 5G also counts with a camera with a much better resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.