Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-03-05 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.26 x 2.92 x 0.35 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Moss green and Rust red | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is much better than realme X50 Pro 5G, getting an 87.1 score against 74.9. Both of these devices come with Android OS, but the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has the newer 14 version while realme X50 Pro 5G has Android 10 version. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra's construction is extremely newer, a bit thinner and just a little lighter than the realme X50 Pro 5G.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a bit sharper screen than realme X50 Pro 5G, because although it has a bit less pixels per inch of display, and they both have exactly the same 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also counts with a really brighter display and a little larger screen.
The realme X50 Pro 5G counts with a much better hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has less RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra takes clearer photos and videos than realme X50 Pro 5G, because although it has a worse 3840x2160 video definition and a much worse 50 MP resolution camera in the back, it also counts with a much larger camera sensor and a bigger aperture.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a much greater storage for games and applications than realme X50 Pro 5G, because it has more internal storage capacity. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a little longer battery duration than realme X50 Pro 5G, because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 4200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.