Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-03-05 | 2021-11-18 |
| 6.26 x 2.92 x 0.35 inches | 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Moss green and Rust red | Glacier Green and Stellar Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 411 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Moto G200 5G has a score of 86.2, which is better than realme X50 Pro 5G's 74.9 overall score. Both of these devices come with Android OS (operating system), but Moto G200 5G has a newer 11 version and realme X50 Pro 5G has Android 10, providing some additional features. Moto G200 5G's body has the same thickness than the realme X50 Pro 5G, but it's a bit lighter.
Realme X50 Pro 5G has a better looking screen than Motorola Moto G200 5G, because although it has a little smaller screen and a quite lower 1080 x 2400 resolution, it also counts with a quite better pixels amount in each inch of screen. Moto G200 5G counts with a bit better performance than realme X50 Pro 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Moto G200 5G also has a higher amount of RAM.
Realme X50 Pro 5G shoots a little bit better photographs and videos than Motorola Moto G200 5G, because although it has a worse (4K) video definition and a much less mega pixels resolution back-facing camera, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture to capture better photos in poorly lited situations.
The Moto G200 5G's memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos is very similar to the realme X50 Pro 5G one, both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity. Moto G200 5G has longer battery duration than realme X50 Pro 5G, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.