Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10 | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2020-03-05 | 2016-09-01 |
| 6.26 x 2.92 x 0.35 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Moss green and Rust red | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Moto Z Force has a general score of 75.8, which is a little bit better than the realme X50 Pro 5G's 74.9 overall score. Both phones in this review have Android OS, but the Motorola Moto Z Force has a more recent 7.0 Nougat version and realme X50 Pro 5G has Android 10. The Motorola Moto Z Force design is way lighter and thinner than the realme X50 Pro 5G, despite of the fact that it was released many years before.
The realme X50 Pro 5G features a little more vivid display than Motorola Moto Z Force, because although it has a just a bit lower pixel number per inch in the screen and a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2400, it also counts with a larger screen. Realme X50 Pro 5G features a little better processing power than Moto Z Force, because it has a larger number of cores (and they are faster) and a greater amount of RAM.
Moto Z Force has a much bigger storage to install applications and games than realme X50 Pro 5G, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with an external SD slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. The realme X50 Pro 5G shoots greater pictures and videos than Moto Z Force, and although they both have the same video resolution, the same aperture and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the realme X50 Pro 5G also has a much more megapixels back camera.
Realme X50 Pro 5G has better battery life than Moto Z Force, because it has a 20% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.