Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-05 | 2016-07-28 |
| 6.26 x 2.92 x 0.35 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Moss green and Rust red | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition has a global score of 76.4, which is just a bit better than the realme X50 Pro 5G's general score of 74.9. Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition is an older phone than realme X50 Pro 5G, but it is noticeably lighter and thinner anyway. The realme X50 Pro 5G has a little faster CPU than Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because it has a higher number of cores and a greater amount of RAM.
The realme X50 Pro 5G counts with a bit more vivid display than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because although it has a just a bit lower pixel density and a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2400, it also counts with a bigger screen. Realme X50 Pro 5G takes much better videos and photos than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the same video frame rates and a F1.8 camera aperture, the realme X50 Pro 5G also has a back camera with much more mega-pixels.
Moto Z Force Droid Edition counts with a way bigger memory to install games and applications than realme X50 Pro 5G, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 1,95 TB. The realme X50 Pro 5G counts with longer battery lifetime than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because it has a 4200mAh battery size instead of 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.