Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-05 | 2017-08-10 |
| 6.26 x 2.92 x 0.35 inches | 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Moss green and Rust red | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 2730mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Moto Z2 Force Edition is just a bit better than realme X50 Pro 5G, with a general score of 77.4 against 74.9. Although the Moto Z2 Force Edition is much older than the realme X50 Pro 5G, it's design is incredibly thinner and extremely lighter. Realme X50 Pro 5G features just a little better processing power than Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have the same number of cores, the realme X50 Pro 5G also has more RAM memory.
Realme X50 Pro 5G features just a bit better looking screen than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because although it has a quite lower count of pixels per inch in the display and a little bit lower 1080 x 2400px resolution, it also counts with a larger screen. Realme X50 Pro 5G takes a lot better photos and videos than Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the realme X50 Pro 5G also has a larger diafragm aperture to take better low light captures and video, a camera with a lot better resolution and a much larger sensor.
Moto Z2 Force Edition counts with a much bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than realme X50 Pro 5G, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. The realme X50 Pro 5G has a much longer battery lifetime than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a 4200mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.