Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-05 | 2017-06-29 |
| 6.26 x 2.92 x 0.35 inches | 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.11 ounces |
| Moss green and Rust red | Gold, Gray and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Moto Z2 Play is a little bit better than the realme X50 Pro 5G, getting a 77.4 score against 74.9. Although the Moto Z2 Play is a lot older than realme X50 Pro 5G, it's construction is notably lighter and much thinner. The realme X50 Pro 5G counts with a sharper screen than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because it has a quite better 1080 x 2400 resolution, a larger screen and a just a bit higher quantity of pixels in each inch in the screen.
Realme X50 Pro 5G counts with just a bit better processing power than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the realme X50 Pro 5G also has 2 GB more RAM. The realme X50 Pro 5G shoots much better pictures and videos than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the realme X50 Pro 5G also counts with a way higher resolution back camera.
The Moto Z2 Play counts with a much greater storage capacity for applications and games than realme X50 Pro 5G, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. The realme X50 Pro 5G features a superior battery life than Moto Z2 Play, because it has a 4200mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.