Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2020-03-05 | 2018-08-16 |
| 6.26 x 2.92 x 0.35 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Moss green and Rust red | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 297.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Moto Z3 is a little bit better than realme X50 Pro 5G, with a 77.6 score against 74.9. These devices come with Android operating system, but the Motorola Moto Z3 has newer 9.0 Pie version and realme X50 Pro 5G has Android 10, so it provides a couple nice extra features. The Motorola Moto Z3 construction is noticeably lighter and notably thinner than the realme X50 Pro 5G, although it was released just 19 months before.
Realme X50 Pro 5G features a sharper screen than Motorola Moto Z3, because it has a little bit bigger display, a little bit higher amount of pixels in each inch in the screen and a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px. Moto Z3 counts with a much greater memory capacity for apps and games than realme X50 Pro 5G, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that holds up to 1,95 TB.
Realme X50 Pro 5G features a little better performance than Motorola Moto Z3, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the realme X50 Pro 5G also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The realme X50 Pro 5G features a much better camera than Moto Z3, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the realme X50 Pro 5G also has a back facing camera with lot more mega-pixels, a lot larger camera sensor providing a way better image quality and a bigger aperture.
Realme X50 Pro 5G features a way better battery life than Moto Z3, because it has a 4200mAh battery size against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.