Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 76.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-05 | 2018-06-29 |
| 6.26 x 2.92 x 0.35 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Moss green and Rust red | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 509 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Moto Z3 Play has a score of 76.3, which is a little bit better than realme X50 Pro 5G's 74.9 score. The Moto Z3 Play body is much thinner and incredibly lighter than realme X50 Pro 5G, despite of the fact that it was released around 21 months before. The realme X50 Pro 5G has a better looking display than Moto Z3 Play, because it has a little bit larger display, a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a just a little better pixel density.
The realme X50 Pro 5G counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, and although they both have the same number of cores, the realme X50 Pro 5G also has more RAM. Motorola Moto Z3 Play counts with a way bigger memory to store more games and applications than realme X50 Pro 5G, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with an external SD slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Realme X50 Pro 5G has a really longer battery duration than Moto Z3 Play, because it has a 4200mAh battery capacity against 3000mAh. Realme X50 Pro 5G features a much better camera than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same (4K) video resolution, the realme X50 Pro 5G also counts with a much larger back-facing camera sensor shooting much higher quality photographs and videos and a lot more mega-pixels back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.