Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-03-05 | 2019-12-04 |
| 6.26 x 2.92 x 0.35 inches | 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Moss green and Rust red | Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 411 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Hyper has a global score of 79.8, which is a bit better than realme X50 Pro 5G's 74.9 score. Both of these phones work with Android OS, but the Motorola One Hyper has 11 version while realme X50 Pro 5G has Android 10. Motorola One Hyper's design has the same thickness than realme X50 Pro 5G, but it's just a little bit lighter.
The realme X50 Pro 5G has just a bit better performance than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have the same number of cores, the realme X50 Pro 5G also has more RAM. The realme X50 Pro 5G features a better screen than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a little greater screen pixel density and a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400.
Motorola One Hyper counts with a much better memory for applications and games than realme X50 Pro 5G, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Motorola One Hyper also has a SD extension slot that allows up to 1000 GB. The realme X50 Pro 5G shoots just a bit better photos and videos than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have a 64 mega pixels resolution back camera, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same video frame rates, the realme X50 Pro 5G also has a bigger aperture.
Realme X50 Pro 5G counts with a bit longer battery duration than Motorola One Hyper, because it has 4200mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.