Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-03-05 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.26 x 2.92 x 0.35 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Moss green and Rust red | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola razr (2020) has an overall score of 87, which is better than realme X50 Pro 5G's overall score of 74.9. Even though the Motorola razr (2020) and the realme X50 Pro 5G were released with only 7 months difference, the Motorola razr (2020) is a little bit lighter and somewhat thinner. These phones use Android operating system, but the Motorola razr (2020) has 11 version while realme X50 Pro 5G has Android 10 version, providing the user lots of additional features.
The realme X50 Pro 5G has a better display than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a quite larger display, a bit better pixels density and a slightly higher 1080 x 2400 resolution. The realme X50 Pro 5G features just a bit better hardware performance than Motorola razr (2020), although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
The realme X50 Pro 5G counts with a little bit better camera than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for low light captures and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same video frame rate, the realme X50 Pro 5G also counts with a larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a much more MP back-facing camera.
Motorola razr (2020) has a much greater memory capacity to install games and applications than realme X50 Pro 5G, because it has 128 GB more internal storage. Realme X50 Pro 5G counts with a superior battery duration than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a 50 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.