Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 80.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-03-05 | 2020-09-23 |
| 6.26 x 2.92 x 0.35 inches | 6.77 x 3.09 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 8.01 ounces |
| Moss green and Rust red | Polar night |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 449.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 411 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Nokia 8.3 5G is a little bit better than realme X50 Pro 5G, having a general score of 80.5 against 74.9. The Nokia 8.3 5G is a a little heavier cellphone than the realme X50 Pro 5G, but both of them are 0.35inches thick. Both devices we compare here use Android OS, but the Nokia 8.3 5G has a more recent 11 version while realme X50 Pro 5G has Android 10 version, so it provides you some extra features.
Realme X50 Pro 5G has a more vivid display than Nokia 8.3 5G, because although it has a quite smaller screen, and they both have the same 1080 x 2400 resolution, the realme X50 Pro 5G also counts with a bit better pixels density. Nokia 8.3 5G features a lot bigger memory for games and applications than realme X50 Pro 5G, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Nokia 8.3 5G also has a SD extension slot that supports up to 512 GB.
The realme X50 Pro 5G has a bit better CPU than Nokia 8.3 5G, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor. The realme X50 Pro 5G shoots better photos and videos than Nokia 8.3 5G, and although they both have the same video frame rate, the same (4K) video definition and a same resolution back camera, the realme X50 Pro 5G also has a larger aperture for better images and videos in poorly lited environments and a way larger back camera sensor taking way higher quality videos and photos.
The Nokia 8.3 5G has a little better battery life than realme X50 Pro 5G, because it has a 7 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.