Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-03-05 | 2019-10-16 |
| 6.26 x 2.92 x 0.35 inches | 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Moss green and Rust red | Cyber shade |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Nubia Red Magic 3S has a score of 75.8, which is just a bit better than the realme X50 Pro 5G's 74.9 general score. Even being the best we are comparing, the nubia Red Magic 3S is an a little thicker and just a little bit heavier phone than realme X50 Pro 5G. Both phones in our current comparison have Android OS (Operating System), but nubia Red Magic 3S has newer 9.0 Pie version while realme X50 Pro 5G has Android 10 version.
The nubia Red Magic 3S features a little bit better performance than realme X50 Pro 5G, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a higher amount of RAM. Realme X50 Pro 5G features a sharper screen than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a quite better 1080 x 2400 resolution and a just a bit more pixels per inch in the screen.
The nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a much better storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than realme X50 Pro 5G, because it has more internal storage. The realme X50 Pro 5G shoots a little bit better photos and videos than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not good for taking photographs and/or video in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the realme X50 Pro 5G also counts with a camera in the back with a lot better resolution, a larger sensor capturing better quality pictures and better 30 fps video frame rate.
Nubia Red Magic 3S counts with greater battery duration than realme X50 Pro 5G, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.