Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 76.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-03-05 | 2020-09-02 |
| 6.26 x 2.92 x 0.35 inches | 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Moss green and Rust red | Sonic silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 579.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The nubia Red Magic 5S is slightly better than realme X50 Pro 5G, getting a global score of 76.2 against 74.9. Both devices we are comparing come with the same Android 10 OS, so they should give all the same OS features. Although nubia Red Magic 5S is a better phone than realme X50 Pro 5G, we must note that it is also a just a little thicker and a little heavier phone.
The realme X50 Pro 5G and the nubia Red Magic 5S feature very similar CPUs, and although the nubia Red Magic 5S has a greater amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. The realme X50 Pro 5G has a little more vivid display than nubia Red Magic 5S, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit greater pixels quantity per screen inch, a little bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a much brighter screen.
Realme X50 Pro 5G and nubia Red Magic 5S both feature extremely similar storage capacity for applications and games, both have exactly the same internal memory. Nubia Red Magic 5S features just a bit better camera than realme X50 Pro 5G, and although they both have a same size camera sensor, a back facing camera with a 64 MP resolution and a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the nubia Red Magic 5S also has a lot higher 7680x4320 video definition.
Nubia Red Magic 5S counts with a little longer battery lifetime than realme X50 Pro 5G, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 4200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.