Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-03-05 | 2020-06-29 |
| 6.26 x 2.92 x 0.35 inches | 6.61 x 3.02 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Moss green and Rust red | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 194.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 411 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Mediatek Helio P35 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 9.84 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A21 has a global score of 76.1, which is a little bit better than realme X50 Pro 5G's overall score of 74.9. Both phones we compare here work with the same Android 10 OS (Operating System), so you shouldn't notice any differences regarding that. Galaxy A21's construction is a little thinner and a little lighter than realme X50 Pro 5G, although both were released with only 4 months difference.
Realme X50 Pro 5G counts with an incredibly better looking display than Galaxy A21, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a lot better 1080 x 2400 resolution and a lot higher display pixel density. The realme X50 Pro 5G features a bit more powerful processor than Samsung Galaxy A21, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the realme X50 Pro 5G also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
Realme X50 Pro 5G counts with a slightly bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy A21, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity. Realme X50 Pro 5G counts with a bit longer battery duration than Galaxy A21, because it has 4200mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Realme X50 Pro 5G takes greater photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A21, and although they both have a F1.8 camera aperture, the realme X50 Pro 5G also has a much bigger back camera sensor shooting way better quality photos, a back-facing camera with lot more mega pixels and a lot better (4K) video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.