Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2020-03-05 | 2021-07-02 |
| 6.26 x 2.92 x 0.35 inches | 6.27 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Moss green and Rust red | Black, Mint, Violet and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 274 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | MediaTek Helio G80 MT6769T (12 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 1.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A22 is a little bit better than realme X50 Pro 5G, with a 76.1 score against 74.9. The Galaxy A22 is a newer phone, and it's also a little lighter and just a little thinner than realme X50 Pro 5G. Both of these phones work with Android OS, but Galaxy A22 has newer 12 version and realme X50 Pro 5G has Android 10 version, offering a lot of extra features and optimized performance.
Realme X50 Pro 5G counts with just a little better hardware performance than Galaxy A22, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the realme X50 Pro 5G also has a greater amount of RAM. Realme X50 Pro 5G counts with a way better screen than Samsung Galaxy A22, and although they both have a same size display, the realme X50 Pro 5G also has a much higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px and more pixels per inch of screen.
Samsung Galaxy A22 features a much better storage capacity to store more games and applications than realme X50 Pro 5G, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that allows up to 1 TB. Realme X50 Pro 5G counts with a much longer battery life than Galaxy A22.
Realme X50 Pro 5G has a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy A22, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the realme X50 Pro 5G also has a much higher 3840x2160 video definition and a much higher resolution back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.