Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 84.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-03-05 | 2021-06-24 |
| 6.26 x 2.92 x 0.35 inches | 6.58 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 7.16 ounces |
| Moss green and Rust red | Gray, Mint, Violet and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 411 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A22 5G has an overall score of 84.6, which is much better than realme X50 Pro 5G's 74.9 overall score. Both of these phones work with Android operating system, but Galaxy A22 5G has a more recent 11 version while realme X50 Pro 5G has Android 10 version. The Galaxy A22 5G is a a little bit lighter phone than the realme X50 Pro 5G, but both of them have the same thickness.
Realme X50 Pro 5G counts with a much better display than Galaxy A22 5G, because although it has a quite smaller screen, and they both have the same exact 1080 x 2400px resolution, the realme X50 Pro 5G also counts with a just a little higher display density. Realme X50 Pro 5G features a little faster processor than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the realme X50 Pro 5G also has more RAM memory.
Realme X50 Pro 5G counts with a much better camera than Galaxy A22 5G, and although they both have the same camera aperture, the realme X50 Pro 5G also has a lot higher video resolution and a back camera with way more mega-pixels. The Samsung Galaxy A22 5G has much more storage capacity for games and applications than realme X50 Pro 5G, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that holds up to 1 TB.
The Galaxy A22 5G has greater battery performance than realme X50 Pro 5G, because it has a 19 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.