Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-03-05 | 2023-12-11 |
| 6.26 x 2.92 x 0.35 inches | 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Moss green and Rust red | Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G68 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G is slightly better than realme X50 Pro 5G, having a global score of 79.9 against 74.9. These phones include Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has a newer 14 version while realme X50 Pro 5G has Android 10 version. The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G body is notably newer, just a little bit lighter and just a little thinner than the realme X50 Pro 5G.
Realme X50 Pro 5G counts with a much greater hardware performance than Galaxy A25 5G. They have a 6 GB RAM memory and 8 cpu cores. Realme X50 Pro 5G features a bit sharper screen than Galaxy A25 5G, because although it has a quite smaller display, and they both have the same screen brightness, the realme X50 Pro 5G also counts with a bit higher 1080 x 2400px resolution and a little higher amount of pixels per screen inch.
The realme X50 Pro 5G captures slightly better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, and although they both have the same video resolution, the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the realme X50 Pro 5G also has a lot better resolution back-facing camera and a way larger camera sensor providing a much higher image quality.
Galaxy A25 5G has much more memory to store more apps and games than realme X50 Pro 5G, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory, the Galaxy A25 5G also has a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 1 TB. The Galaxy A25 5G counts with longer battery life than realme X50 Pro 5G, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.