Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 79.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-05 | 2019-03-02 |
| 6.26 x 2.92 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.82 ounces |
| Moss green and Rust red | Black, Blue and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A30 has a general score of 79.6, which is a bit better than realme X50 Pro 5G's overall score of 74.9. Despite of the fact that the Galaxy A30 is older than realme X50 Pro 5G, it's construction is somewhat lighter and somewhat thinner. The realme X50 Pro 5G has a sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A30, and although they both have a same size display, the realme X50 Pro 5G also has a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a just a bit more pixels per screen inch.
Realme X50 Pro 5G features a bit better processor than Galaxy A30, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the realme X50 Pro 5G also has a larger amount of RAM. Galaxy A30 has a bigger memory capacity for games and applications than realme X50 Pro 5G, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that holds up to 512 GB.
Realme X50 Pro 5G has a little longer battery duration than Galaxy A30, because it has 4200mAh of battery capacity. Realme X50 Pro 5G counts with a way better camera than Galaxy A30, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is worse for low light images, it also counts with a lot higher resolution back facing camera, a much bigger sensor taking way better quality pictures and a way better video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.