Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-03-05 | 2019-09-20 |
| 6.26 x 2.92 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Moss green and Rust red | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1560 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 268 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A30s has an overall score of 79.8, which is slightly better than the realme X50 Pro 5G's 74.9 overall score. Both phones we compare here come with Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy A30s has a newer 11 version and realme X50 Pro 5G has Android 10, so it provides a couple nice extra features and performance tweaks. Although the Samsung Galaxy A30s and the realme X50 Pro 5G were released with only a couple months difference, the Samsung Galaxy A30s is thinner and lighter.
The realme X50 Pro 5G counts with a lot better screen than Samsung Galaxy A30s, and although they both have a same size screen, the realme X50 Pro 5G also has a much greater pixel density and a lot higher resolution of 1080 x 2400. The Samsung Galaxy A30s counts with a much greater storage capacity for games and applications than realme X50 Pro 5G, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy A30s also has an external memory slot that allows up to 512 GB.
The realme X50 Pro 5G has a bit better performance than Galaxy A30s, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the realme X50 Pro 5G also has 2 GB more RAM memory. The realme X50 Pro 5G shoots much better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A30s, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not good for low light photography and video, it also counts with a way higher 64 megapixels resolution camera and a lot better 3840x2160 video definition.
Realme X50 Pro 5G features just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Galaxy A30s, because it has a 4200mAh battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.