Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-03-05 | 2020-04-27 |
| 6.26 x 2.92 x 0.35 inches | 6.27 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Moss green and Rust red | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A31 is just a bit better than realme X50 Pro 5G, getting an 81.3 score against 74.9. These devices work with the same Android 10 OS. Even when Galaxy A31 and realme X50 Pro 5G were released with only a couple of months difference, Galaxy A31 is a little lighter and a little bit thinner. The realme X50 Pro 5G counts with a little faster processing unit than Galaxy A31, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the realme X50 Pro 5G also has more RAM memory.
Realme X50 Pro 5G features a brighter display than Galaxy A31. Both have the same quantity of pixels in each inch of screen, a screen of the same size and exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels. The realme X50 Pro 5G captures much clearer videos and photos than Galaxy A31, because it has a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, a way higher resolution back-facing camera, a larger back-facing camera sensor shooting better quality videos and photos and a larger aperture to take better low-light captures.
The Samsung Galaxy A31 features more memory to store more apps and games than realme X50 Pro 5G, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 512 GB. The Galaxy A31 counts with better battery duration than realme X50 Pro 5G, because it has a 19% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.