Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 79.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-03-05 | 2024-03-11 |
| 6.26 x 2.92 x 0.35 inches | 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Moss green and Rust red | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 390 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G68 MP5 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A35 5G is a bit better than the realme X50 Pro 5G, getting a global score of 79.4 against 74.9. Both devices in our current comparison come with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy A35 5G has the newer 14 version while realme X50 Pro 5G has Android 10, so it provides some nice extra features and increased performance. Galaxy A35 5G's construction is much newer and just a little bit thinner than realme X50 Pro 5G's, but it is just a bit heavier.
The realme X50 Pro 5G has a very superior performance than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G. They have a Octa-Core CPU and the same RAM amount. The realme X50 Pro 5G features just a bit better looking display than Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with much more brightness, a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a quite higher pixels density.
The realme X50 Pro 5G and the Galaxy A35 5G both count with really similar storage capacity to install games and applications, both of them have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory. Realme X50 Pro 5G has a little bit better camera than Galaxy A35 5G, and although they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the realme X50 Pro 5G also has a back camera with a much better resolution and a larger camera sensor taking better quality videos and photos.
The Galaxy A35 5G has greater battery performance than realme X50 Pro 5G, because it has a 19% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.