Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 79.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-03-05 | 2019-04-10 |
| 6.26 x 2.92 x 0.35 inches | 5.69 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 4.94 ounces |
| Moss green and Rust red | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.9 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 437 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Exynos 7904 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 3100mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A40 has a general score of 79.6, which is a bit better than the realme X50 Pro 5G's global score of 74.9. The Samsung Galaxy A40 body is way lighter and thinner than realme X50 Pro 5G, even though it was released only 11 months before. Both of these devices come with Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy A40 has newer 11 version while realme X50 Pro 5G has Android 10 version, providing the user some additional features and better performance.
Realme X50 Pro 5G features a little faster processing unit than Galaxy A40, and although they both have the same number of cores, the realme X50 Pro 5G also has 2 GB more RAM memory. Realme X50 Pro 5G has a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A40, because although it has a bit worse display pixel density, it also counts with a little bigger screen and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels.
The Samsung Galaxy A40 features a quite bigger memory capacity for games and applications than realme X50 Pro 5G, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. Realme X50 Pro 5G has superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A40, because it has a 4200mAh battery size.
The realme X50 Pro 5G captures much better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy A40, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not so good for low light images and videos, it also counts with a lot more MP back camera, a lot larger sensor shooting way higher quality videos and photographs and a much higher (4K) video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.