Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-05 | 2017-01-13 |
| 6.26 x 2.92 x 0.35 inches | 5.75 x 2.81 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.61 ounces |
| Moss green and Rust red | Black sky, Blue mist, Gold sand and Peach cloud |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-T830 MP3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A5 (2017) is a bit better than realme X50 Pro 5G, with a 75.8 score against 74.9. The Galaxy A5 (2017) is an notably older phone than realme X50 Pro 5G, but it is much lighter and thinner anyway. Realme X50 Pro 5G counts with a much better display than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017), because although it has a quite lower pixels density, it also counts with a slightly higher 1080 x 2400px resolution and a bigger screen.
Realme X50 Pro 5G features just a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017), and although they both have the same number of cores, the realme X50 Pro 5G also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Realme X50 Pro 5G has more storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017), because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory.
The realme X50 Pro 5G features a way better camera than Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has a lot higher video quality, a back camera with way more mega-pixels and a bigger aperture to take better captures and video in poorly lited situations. Realme X50 Pro 5G counts with a superior battery duration than Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has a 40 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.