Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-05 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.26 x 2.92 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Moss green and Rust red | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50 is much better than realme X50 Pro 5G, having an 83.8 score against 74.9. The Galaxy A50 is an older cellphone than the realme X50 Pro 5G, but it is lighter and thinner anyway. Realme X50 Pro 5G counts with a much better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A50, and although they both have a display with the same size, the realme X50 Pro 5G also has a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a quite greater count of pixels per inch of display.
The Samsung Galaxy A50 features a superior memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than realme X50 Pro 5G, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A50 also has a SD card slot that allows up to 512 GB. Realme X50 Pro 5G counts with a little faster CPU than Galaxy A50, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the realme X50 Pro 5G also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Realme X50 Pro 5G features a better camera than Galaxy A50, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, it also counts with a much higher 3840x2160 video definition, a back-facing camera with a much better resolution and a lot larger camera sensor which gives a lot better image and video quality.
Realme X50 Pro 5G has a little better battery duration than Galaxy A50, because it has 4200mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.