Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-03-05 | 2019-10-20 |
| 6.26 x 2.92 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Moss green and Rust red | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A50s is better than realme X50 Pro 5G, having a general score of 86.6 against 74.9. Both phones in our current comparison use the same Android 10 OS (Operating System), so both should offer the same OS features. Samsung Galaxy A50s is a somewhat thinner and lighter phone than realme X50 Pro 5G, although they were released with only 5 months difference.
The realme X50 Pro 5G has a sharper screen than Galaxy A50s, and although they both have a same size display, the realme X50 Pro 5G also has a bit more pixels per inch in the display and a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px. Galaxy A50s counts with a superior memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than realme X50 Pro 5G, and although they both have equal internal memory, the Galaxy A50s also has a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 512 GB.
The realme X50 Pro 5G features just a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy A50s. Both of them have 8 cores and 6 GB of RAM. Realme X50 Pro 5G counts with a bit longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy A50s, because it has a 4200mAh battery capacity. The realme X50 Pro 5G shoots a bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy A50s, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the realme X50 Pro 5G also has a much higher 64 MP resolution camera, a bigger camera aperture and a bigger back camera sensor shooting better quality videos and photos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.